Talk:China Labor Watch

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour Start‑class Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:China Labor Watch/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

I have been receiving a Yahoo newsgroup letter from CLW for over a month. During that time I have received two letters detailing labor abuses committed in Chinese factories that serve as suppliers to Foxconn. corp and Adidas. corp. Their website contains dozens of further investigative reports that have been compiled over the course of the organization's eight years regarding the many prominent multinational corporations that contract out to the sweat shops of China, all of them highly critical of the multinationals for their contractual involvement with these suppliers. CLW does a very commendable job of giving very exact and thorough details of worker hours/salary, living conditions in factory dorms, and the nature of the petty fines that are levied against workers for not meeting job criteria, etc..

There is a problem though, in my opinion, with CLW's slant. Virtually all of these factories are either operated and managed by Taiwanese firms or are S.E.O.s. Yet, in perusing their website one never reads a word about these Taiwanese firms involvement or the fact that is the Chinese government itself that is responsible for instituting and enforcing the abominable working conditions of these factories. Rather, their angst seems entirely focused on the multinationals.

It is a fact, of course, that the multinationals take advantage of the situation in these huge factories that they contract to supply them with the bountiful, cheap labor which produces their goods. However, it is highly unlikely that they are the ones who are propagating the astringent labor practices found on the floors of these factories. Indeed, these abominable labor practices have their origin in only one place; in the mentality of the Chinese/Taiwanese management that runs these sweat shops. It is inconceivable to me that the multinationals, as "nefarious" as they may be, are actually mandating the management practices of these factories. They may come to the Chinese management of these sweat shops with a very sharp pencil about how much they will pay, but in the end it is the Chinese/Taiwanese management that is culpable for this worker exploitation, and I think it is safe to say that top officials of these companies are not financially or emotionally suffering for their involvement with the western multinationals, only their employees. CLW is not in complete integrity with the truth.

Last edited at 00:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 11:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Citations/Sources

I have some concerns that this article is based primarily on sources provided by China Labor Watch's own website, and is almost completely devoid of inline citation. The Time article provided only shows a preview, and the BBC site is in Chinese and does not seem to provide a translation. I think that this article would be vastly improved with some more secondary sources. 74.93.182.21 (talk) 14:53, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on China Labor Watch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726170505/http://www.icti-care.org/ICF_Statement_Regarding_China_Labor_Watch_Report_070919.pdf to http://www.icti-care.org/ICF_Statement_Regarding_China_Labor_Watch_Report_070919.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]