This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy
This is informal and lacks information. If anyone has any information on the Natick Army Labs, please add it here. Also change the red link so it links to a real article. --TimD02:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I intend to dress this up shortly. Incidentally, it needs to be moved, because the proper name for the center is the Natick Soldier Systems Center, which reflects an updating from the Natick Laboratory name it had for most of its life.-SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) (talk) 23:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to me that this article is named backwards. That the facility name should lead and that the current (ridiculously overlong in that way only the US Army can pull off) title, which is just one of the commands located there, should be the redirect. In other words, is this article about the installation or the spot on the organizational flow chart? Because the former is a real thing, while he latter is just bureaucratic trivia. I think the title should be flipped and the lead reorganized to reflect that. oknazevad (talk) 15:06, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think the title should be long enough to give an idea of what installation we're writing about, and (as much as possible) be what people really call it. "Soldier Center" would be too short and generic. I'm not in the armed services, so I don't know what soldiers really call it. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:33, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
