This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cartoon Network, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Cartoon Network on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cartoon NetworkWikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkTemplate:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkCartoon Network
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s
The inclusion of the word "kiss" is important because it is heavily discussed both in the Production and the Reception sections. Without a mention, these sections are completely without context for the casual reader. Additionally, 'embrace' does not equate to 'kiss', so it's an obfuscation to say the least.--Gen. Quon(Talk)21:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've re-read this article twice now and the Panasonic bit makes absolutely no sense, in both the intro, and the "Panasonic Kijang" paragraph/section. It reads like an Adventure Time article that suddenly turns into a promotional for some car for (what feels like) no apparent reason. Maybe it's just me, but at the moment I get the impression that, at best, the article assumes readers already have the pre-existing background knowledge on the matter, or worse, that it's some kind of accidental merging of two unrelated articles.
