Talk:Danielle Macdonald

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Danielle Macdonald is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Date of birth

@Laterthanyouthink: an editor has added back her date of birth (which you had removed), with a reference, but I’m dubious as to its reliability. The referenced article was likely written when her date of birth was included in the articlespace, as so many of these articles are just regurgitations of Wikipedia articles. I support the DOB removal if this reference is not deemed good enough. Seasider53 (talk) 17:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree - although cannot see the source, it looks unlikely. When in doubt, leave it out, per WP:DOB. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have examined the source. It is a fully researched biography of Danielle, and published by the same publisher who publishes the Daily Mirror and Birmingham Post, both classed as reliable. If any doubts remain, it might be worth raising the matter at WP:RSN where the issues can be fully debated. 156.61.250.249 (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]