Jump to content

Talk:De Lackner HZ-1 Aerocycle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDe Lackner HZ-1 Aerocycle has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 29, 2010Good article nomineeListed
November 3, 2011WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 3, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the de Lackner Aerocycle (pictured) was intended to be flown by infantrymen after only 20 minutes of flight training?
Current status: Good article

Comment

[edit]

Interesting article. I think some of the details about captain Sundby are a bit excessive. I propose changing:

Captain Sundby was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for his test-flying work with the HZ-1,[1] going on to test-fly the H-21 and H-34 helicopters, as well as seeing combat in the Vietnam War before retiring with the rank of Colonel.[12]

to simply

Captain Sundby was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for his test-flying work with the HZ-1,[1].

I don't mean to be pedantic, but Sundby's later career should probably be covered in a seperate article or not at all. Thanks. --188.126.207.212 (talk) 11:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply! I might see if I can get enough info on Sundby to spin off a bio page for him. :) - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 16:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

[edit]

As an infrequent editor, I am a little unsure as to what qualifies as a verifiable source, especially with regard to the entry I made that the Evergreen Aviation & Space Museum had acquired the prototype HZ-1 (specifically the DH-4) with the civil registration N64N. As the museum's curator, am I not a verifiable source (or am I considered original research?) or do I have to have someone add the information and quote me for it to be verified? We have the DH-4 (and paid the owners of former deLackner factory $10K for it) and have it currently in our restoration shop. I have photos of the actual artifact to back it up. I'm just curious as to how to do it so that we let people know that two of these flying machines survive, not just the one at Ft. Eustis? Swbailey97128 (talk) 00:40, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What you need to do is to have a published source - say, a local newspaper article announcing that the aircraft is in your collection. It doesn't have to be online, but it does have to have been published, and third-party sources are preferable (however, I believe in the case of an "artifact X is in museum Y" citation, the museum itself can be cited; if you have a webpage on the museum's official site that features the de Lackner, then that would be OK). - The Bushranger One ping only 02:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bushranger, thanks so much for the help. As I said, I only want researchers to know that we are lucky enough to have two of these left, not just the one at Ft. Eustis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swbailey97128 (talk • contribs) 22:53, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on De Lackner HZ-1 Aerocycle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on De Lackner HZ-1 Aerocycle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:De_Lackner_HZ-1_Aerocycle&oldid=1206902483"