Jump to content

Talk:Diablo Canyon Power Plant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

US Court of Appeals

[edit]

Why is there no mention of the current case in front of the US Court of Appeals regarding safety and closure of DCNPP?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To not merge, given the contemporary relevance, sourcing and independent notability of [[Diablo Canyon earthquake vulnerability]]. Klbrain (talk) 13:42, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be an instance of WP:NOTNEWS and WP:SYNTH and WP:INDISCRIMINATE simply stating facts about the topic. I do sense that this is borderline notable as seismology of Diablo Canyon is well discussed, but I think this information is better suited for the main article about the power plant. Awesome Aasim 03:03, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. ---Avatar317(talk) 00:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose merge - Article is valuable as a stand-alone and likely to become more so as discussion continues in California as to the wisdom of continuing the operation of a nuclear power plant at the location. Jusdafax (talk) 12:11, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Merge- Article is well sourced and proves its worth as a standalone article. NewishIdeas (talk) 22:27, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.