Talk:Diplodocidae

Dinosaurs Mid‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Let's name names. :-)

"A diplodocid was recently found with a row of keratinous (horny, not bony) spines running down its back." -- Which diplodocid (or find), please? -- Writtenonsand 12:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diplodocus sp. Can't seem to find the ref though. And I'd remove 'recently', it was found in 1992. Dinoguy2 21:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...actually I wonderd about this at the time as there wasn't a whole lot written on the subject. I agree it is worth following up as it is an interesting facet of what they may look like...cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 22:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the "Baby Toni" picture

A recent study showed that Toni was actually a Brachiosaurus. (Carballido, J.L.; Marpmann, J.S.; Schwarz-Wings, D.; and Pabst, B. (2012). "New information on a juvenile sauropod specimen from the Morrison Formation and the reassessment of its systematic position". Palaeontology 55 (2): 567–582.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.159.230.184 (talk) 09:38, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brachiosaurus or brachiosaur? FunkMonk (talk) 11:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A WP:OR?

This article contains the unreferenced text "(though in life the nostrils themselves would have been close to the tip of the snout)". Who decided that? It seems likelier to me that in such a huge animal having to breathe through such a small head, the nostrils would have to be so big that they could only fit in on top of the head. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's based on this study:[1] It has gone unchallenged since. FunkMonk (talk) 07:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diplodocid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061229123136/http://skeletaldrawing.com/sauropods/sauropods.htm to http://skeletaldrawing.com/sauropods/sauropods.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]