Talk:Disciples II: Dark Prophecy
NEVANDAR: Game reference materials call the world Nevandaar, but elsewhere it is called the Sacred Lands. Which is it? I am assuming that the Sacred Lands is the correct name, and that Nevandaar is either another term for the Sacred Lands, a race-specific term (most likely used by the Empire, as that is the main faction), or a term for a large area of the world (most likely the area ruled by the Empire, as they appear to be the largest nation).
- The world is called 'The Sacred Lands', and the Empire is Nevendaar. I think the manual to the game is written from the Empire's point of view. That's to the best of my knowledge anyway. Dragonfly888 20:11, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- The original name for the world is Nevendaar, as called by its creator angel Bethrezen. I believe the 'Sacred Lands' is a human name for it (perhaps just for the lands of the Empire). ChronoLegion 7 August 2006
Divergence of Story
[edit]The story seems to diverge in the Undead and Legions campaigns. In one Uther dies, in the other he does not. Does it indeed diverge depending on which campaign is playing? AThousandYoung (talk) 22:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Stardock insert will be removed
[edit]Strategy First Inc. is both publisher and developer of Disciples II.
Stardock has produced Disciples II: Ultimate Edition (compilation and add-on).
I see no reason why "Stardock line of products" should be placed at the end of the article about a game developed and published initially by Strategy First.
Disciples II: Ultimate Edition surely deserves to be mentioned somewhere in the article. If you have any reliable info on this particular compilation please add. (Update: added their website to the list of external links)
Collector's Edition
[edit]The article states that the Gold edition contains several scenarios "not found in any other edition". Aren't these the same 'bonus' scenarios as are found on the Collector's Edition of Dark Prophecy? If so, the article needs correcting. If not, surely the Collector's Edition deserves a mention because of the (additional) bonus scenarios? Magnate 21:08, 24 August 2006 (UTC) Answered my own question: the Collector's Edition scenarios are included in the Gold edition. The Gold edition has 5 additional scenarios not found anywhere else. Splendid. Magnate 00:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Demo is dead link —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.62.128.236 (talk) 10:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Disciples II Dark Prophecy.jpg
[edit]
Image:Disciples II Dark Prophecy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Disciples II GE.jpg
[edit]Image:Disciples II GE.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Disciples II GOTL.jpg
[edit]Image:Disciples II GOTL.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Disciples II GR.jpg
[edit]Image:Disciples II GR.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Disciples II ROTE.jpg
[edit]Image:Disciples II ROTE.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Disciples II SOTD.jpg
[edit]Image:Disciples II SOTD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
More information on versions of Disciples II
[edit]I've adjusted the existing section on expansions to include information on all editions of Disciples II. If you've got any additional information to include or can think of a better way to organise all the information (I'm not too fond of having some with dot points and some without) or if I accidentally included British spelling feel free to change it or make a comment here. Piratepatch (talk) 04:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- This comment edit was accidentally marked as "minor". Adding this edit to add a comment to show that it was an error. Piratepatch (talk) 04:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Disciples II: Dark Prophecy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051013070540/http://www.strategyfirst.com:80/en/ to http://www.strategyfirst.com/en/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)