Talk:Dump'n'Chase
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Requested move 22 February 2025
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that Dump'n'Chase be renamed and moved to Dump and chase. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Dump'n'Chase → Dump and chase – Per consistency with listed sources. Filing as RM to give article creator a chance to voice objections in case there's something I missed. Left guide (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support as per nom. 162 etc. (talk) 00:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom. I'm also wondering if there is a MOS on this usage? Conyo14 (talk) 01:06, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support as per WP:COMMONNAME in the cited sources. Flibirigit (talk) 08:11, 23 February 2025 (UTC)