Talk:Eagle Seagull

Comments

i hate bands that write their own wikipedia article. lame. so very, very lame.

i agree. this sounds like a publicity release. does anyone else know some real info about them? time for an edit.

...and I'm annoyed by people who don't even sign their entries on the Talk pages... --afromme 03:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged the article as an autobiography because I felt that it most closely matched the state of the article. The edit history notes that the page was created and largely maintained by one person who, judging by the tone of the article, is a proud member of the band. Perhaps someone who is familiar with the band, but not too closely attached could write a more strictly factual, less enthusiastic article.

--blindogt 12:45, 18 May 2008 (EST)

File:EagleSeagull2010.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:EagleSeagull2010.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]