Jump to content

Talk:Edward Moss (impersonator)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Appearance

[edit]

We should try to explain if possible that he is famous for using Jackson's recent appearance (2000 onwards). I've personally never seen him use the image of Jackson from the 80's-90's. Obviously before he became..."famous" he must have used older versions of Jackson's image. But he only started getting film roles this decade and they show a modern era Jackson.

It would have been nice to show an image of Jackson in the 2000's and then show an image of Moss in the 2000's to compare. Shockingly though, wikipedia doesn't have any free images of Jackson after 1987. — Realist2 19:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Might also be nice to note that he doesn't have plastic surgery / much plastic surgery. It seems to all be done with prosthetic's, makeup and a wig. — Realist2 23:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Edward Moss ?

[edit]

Looking at this, should we drop the (impersonator) part of the article title? — Realist2 23:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Edward Moss (impersonator). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]