Talk:Electoral district of Davenport

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Australia: South Australia / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Electoral district of Davenport is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Poll Bludger?

I've removed the link to Poll Bludger. It's empty. Linking to an empty page, then asking pollbludger to update it, is saying, "I've no idea what poll bludger will say, but I'm sure it's good". Totally out of place for a wikipedia link IMHO. In any case, why do we need to link to Poll Bludger anyway, when there's a perfectly good ABC election profile? Rocksong 00:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While its temporarily offline at the moment, I can assure you that PollBludger is a very interesting and reliable source of information. When the link is active again I'll restore it. michael ^talk 02:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL the link WAS active! I was replied to at 2:51pm yesterday telling me the broken URL had been fixed. Hey Rocksong, next time try a Ctrl + refresh ;D Reverting. Timeshift 06:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops sorry. Having said that, there's nothing there that's not on the ABC link, and I fail to see why pollbludger.com is so wonderful that it deserves a link from every electorate page. Rocksong 11:32, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO, hardly. Poll Bludger doesn't hold back. The mass media, including ABC to a certain extent, do. Timeshift 11:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I probably overstated by opposition to including it. I'll go with the consensus. Rocksong 12:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Davenport 2014 - can anyone explain?

One of the strongest Labor swings was in this seat - Belair actually voted Labor!! Other nearby booths also swung at around 5% 2PP to Labor. Does anyone know of any local factors at play here? Timeshift (talk) 05:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]