Talk:Empress Chung

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Korea Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated working groups:
/
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

Animation: Asian / Films Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Asian animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).

North Korean version versus South Korean Version.

This article fails to mention that the North Korean version of *Empress Chung [Wanghu SimChŏng]* is slight different from the South Korean Version of *Empress Chung [Wanghu SimChŏng}]*. The South Korean version of *Empress Chung* has a minute not included in the North Korean version of *Empress Chung*, as well as some slightly altered scenes and dialog. This was briefly discussed during The Korea Society's special screening of *Empress Chung*, before *Empress Chung*'s brief North American release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.238.93 (talk) 00:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Empress Chung. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303213435/http://www.newschinamag.com/magazine/drawing-out-the-hermit/ to http://www.newschinamag.com/magazine/drawing-out-the-hermit/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Lost" film

I took out the lost descriptors from this article. I don't think that's an accurate classification. The film apparently played at a festival as recently as 2019, and its director is still alive and the studios behind it are operational. It seems implausible that the movie doesn't exist in any form, and it strikes me as inaccurate to slap the "lost" label on this page because it doesn't have a home media release. Sound off if you disagree. Nohomersryan (talk) 18:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]