Talk:Enterprise (train service)

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK / Passenger trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	August 6, 2017

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

Templates

Regarding the use of templates on this page, which is the basis of the "revert war". A compromise was suggested (by yours truly) to keep both the {{Irish train operators}} template and the {{Current UK TOCs}} template on the page. This seemed to be accepted, given the relatively peaceful few days, until a single Wikipedia member decided to renew his hostility. Given that the majority of people have accepted the compromise, surely that should be what is displayed on the page, and not the seeming prejudices of one individual. Hammersfan 10/05/06, 14.15 BST

Wouldn't it make more sense to remove NI completely from the British TOCs template? There's zero overlap and it would match how the railways are administered --Dtcdthingy 15:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with this - railways are quite separate between Great Britain and Ireland (the little matter of the Irish Sea, and a difference in standard gauge, as well as their mostly being constructed before partition).

zoney ♣ talk 23:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Having looked at the British TOCs template, I think it's probably no harm to include it on this page. It does have an appropriate footnote that NIR and Enterprise run on the Irish Railway Network. zoney ♣ talk 23:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

How about a better pic, showing an Enterprise engine with the Enterprise carriages?--Dub8lad1 00:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced statements

Virtually none of the statements of fact in the article are supported by references or citations. I have flagged a few of the more significant ones. The links to the NIR and IE Enterprise Web pages provide only a small amount of general information and advertising, and almost nothing about the history of the service, including interruptions during the Troubles. 4.243.152.8 08:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While the statements are unsourced, some of these are common knowledge. The speed limit on much of the Enterprise line is 70mph - such as around Lisburn - so it's not possible to reach 90mph on the entire route. On the other hand, disruption is still common, HEP-related loco failures and carriage parking brake faults regularly take the DeDietrich stock out of service, requiring a swap with 071s+Mk2s or 29000/C3K railcars. Rolling stock substitution often delays services significantly. Karsini 23:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to remember clocking that thing at over 100 coming back from Dublin, sometimes as high as 110. --Eamonnca1 20:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dream on, max service speed is 90, 201 overspeed trip set at 103Suckindiesel 22:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - I see that 82.7.122.229 is up to his old tricks of adding unsupported statements, so have attached a "citation needed". The previous claim, 23 February 2007, that "I have used this train twice a week, every week, for twenty one years to commute to Dublin" is hardly relevant as the current service has been in operation for only 10 years. Even using his example gives an average speed of approx 49 mph as the distance is actually 113.5 miles, not 110 miles. I propose to revert his edit in a week's time if no citation provided. Suckindiesel 16:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - Somebody is sure getting hot under the collar re Enterprise speeds. I've removed anything unsupported & corrected the journey times as quoted in NIR's timetable. The "complaint" that the train never arrives in Dublin before 09:00 is in fact quite correct, as it isn't due to arrive until 09:05, according to the timetable. Suckindiesel (talk) 21:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - - While not wishing to discourage genuine corrections someone hates all rail projects it seems; can't find and other western urban transport systems which have to carry such extensive "criticism" sections as the Luas and DART. (And I'm not a Rail Head!) (Sarah777 (talk) 00:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

however fast the enterprise it is SLOW... it does nothing but constanly speed up and brake. Its also the roughest train i have ever been on! I found it very hard to drink my coffee or even walk without holding on to the toilet! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.141.193 (talk) 15:33, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Information

How about an indication of current fare levels? Deipnosophista 09:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Enterprise (train service).png

Image:Enterprise (train service).png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Enterprise (train service). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120208083903/http://www.irrs.ie/Journal%20157/157%20News%20NIR.htm to http://www.irrs.ie/Journal%20157/157%20News%20NIR.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading route map

I noticed the route map on this article includes lots of stations not served by the Enterprise. It seems to be the full map of the Dublin to Belfast line as opposed to one for this service, which normally has just 4 intermediate stops. Shouldn't it be changed? 2A01:B340:62:172E:95E:E8FD:17F1:9D0C (talk) 13:09, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]