Talk:Environmental issues in Brazil
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
[edit]What a stub.--67.87.36.128 (talk) 04:50, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Merger proposal
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose to merge Water pollution in Brazil into Environmental issues in Brazil. I think that the content in the water pollution article should be explained in context, and the environmental issues article is small enough that the merging will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Jguglielmin (talk) 14:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Merger proposal
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- stale. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:46, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Indeed, I agree with the comment above. This article is useless in this form and overlaps in scope with Conservation in Brazil and Environment of Brazil. Therefor propose merging it into Environment of Brazil. --Elekhh (talk) 10:13, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. Yes, there is overlap and yes it is a stub, but they are not reasons for merging. It needs expanding since it is a notable topic that deserves its own article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Forbidding of cattle ranching in areas of Brazil that have much rainforest
[edit]It actually puzzles me why the government of Brazil hasn't all ready outright forbidden cattle ranching in the Brazilian areas that have much rainforest. Protein foods can be easier and much more efficiently produced using other farming techniques that don't use cattle at all (for example, factories can be set up that produce tofu or quorn (single cell protein), ... ). The soy required for the tofu can be imported from countries that don't have rainforest (and so don't require the cutting of trees to raise crops); examples are parts of China, ...). Alternatively, meat can also be imported from Europe or the west of the USA, ..., or rather than trying to find meat or meat replacements, other protein foods can be directly imported (like beans, ...) for example from Cuba, the USA, ...
An alternative to outright forbidding it would be to just forbid clearcutting any more areas and/or using any more areas than what the ranchers all ready own.
I think that this approach would benefit more people (lower and mid-income people) and only hurts a very small portion of the population (the ranchers) -actually, not even them if they decide to switch to more efficient means of protein food productions such as by the tofu production method proposed, especially as it would be more efficient and so more money could be gained by this approach than by using cattle-, so politically speaking, it's actually a good tactic for politicians, as it would help win a lot of votes. Also, it would be very good for the environment and even the economy (as it's much more efficient and probably even a lot cheaper to just create alternative protein foods locally, or import meat/meat substitutes from other areas, especially if the co2 compensations have been calculated in.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Environmental issues in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120211065606/http://ethanolrfa.org/pages/World-Fuel-Ethanol-Production to http://ethanolrfa.org/pages/World-Fuel-Ethanol-Production
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120124050437/http://www.waste-management-world.com/index/display/article-display/1476541567/articles/waste-management-world/volume-12/issue-3/features/wte-the-redeemer-of-brazils-waste-legacy.html to http://www.waste-management-world.com/index/display/article-display/1476541567/articles/waste-management-world/volume-12/issue-3/features/wte-the-redeemer-of-brazils-waste-legacy.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426022611/http://cempre.tecnologia.ws/ciclosoft_2008.php to http://cempre.tecnologia.ws/ciclosoft_2008.php
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.brasil.gov.br/sobre/environment/legislation - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.brasil.gov.br/sobre/environment/programs-and-initiatives/government-actions/br_model1?set_language=en - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.brasil.gov.br/sobre/environment/climate-change/climate-change/br_template_completo?set_language=en
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Government Role in Environmental issues
[edit]This article makes no mention of the Brazilian government's role in the worsening environmental issues. I plan to discuss how President Bolsonaro has encouraged the exploitation of the amazon, as well as the lack of enforcement of environmental protection laws within Brazil. I plan to use at least three sources to do so, including: "Threats to the Brazilian Environment and Environmental Policy" https://globalcenters.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/Rio/Workshop_Report_Threats%20to%20the%20Brazilian%20Environment.pdf
"Environmental governance under Bolsonaro: dismantling institutions, curtailing participation, delegitimising opposition" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358914/
"Brazil, once a champion of environmentalism, grapples with new role as climate antagonist" https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/11/02/brazil-cop26-deforestation-bolsonaro/ Agh0707 (talk) 19:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Modern Brazil
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Agh0707 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Katherine.Holt (talk) 16:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
[edit]This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Michigan supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class Brazil articles
- Mid-importance Brazil articles
- WikiProject Brazil articles
- C-Class Environment articles
- Mid-importance Environment articles
- C-Class Climate change articles
- Mid-importance Climate change articles
- WikiProject Climate change articles
- Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2011 Q3