Talk:Eon (novel)

Novels: Sci-fi Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force.

Nader

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2009/09/28/090928ta_talk_khatchadourian

"A few weeks ago, Nader was working the phones in Washington, trying to reach the people he had fictionalized. “I feel that if I am going to do that to people, I want to give them all a heads up,” he said. “It’s been done to me, you know.” In the novel “Still Life with Woodpecker,” by Tom Robbins, published in 1980, Nader appears as the romantic obsession of a mythical princess (“She fell quickly asleep and dreamt of Ralph Nader”). Five years later, the science-fiction writer Greg Bear wrote “Eon,” which portrays Nader as “a saintly figure, a hero in a wasteland,” whose followers win landslide elections in North America and Western Europe (in 2011) and bring down the Soviet Union (in 2012). “You see, that’s science-fiction utopia,” Nader said. “Nobody can give that any credibility.”"

--Gwern (contribs) 01:11 25 September 2009 (GMT)

Thanks

Just a heads up to whoever wrote "...with the US and NATO allied nations succeeding" in the first paragraph...

..thanks for spoiling the book for me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommyhaych (talk • contribs) 11:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SW 71.235.169.71 (talk) 13:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unless this is your very first day on Wikipedia, you should know that the pages for almost every movie, television show, and book give away major plot points. Primium mobile (talk) 18:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And, since that quote is at this time not there any longer in the article, YOU (who were thanking someone else for spoiling the book for you), have now yourself somewhat 'spoiled' the book for others! Ironic! UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 09:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]