Talk:Euroscepticism
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Euroscepticism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Doubled language?
[edit]The reasoning section seems to repeat what is said earlier in the introduction. One of them should either be expanded or deleted. Just checking if there's consensus for this. ForTheGrammar "Police" James (talk) 23:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
The part about euroscepticism in the UK reads pretty biased
[edit]Specifically the part about cameron's Eu referendum policy.
No sources are listed and it reads like something from RationalWiki (which does not try to be as neutral and unbiased as possible as wikipedia Tamblingb (talk) 23:31, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Further reading
[edit]Does the entry need a further reading entry. Currently there are two “References” sections but only three citations in the latter? She'll need more tests. (talk) 00:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)