Jump to content

Talk:Executive Order 13303

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment

[edit]

This is an example of the crookedness of this administration!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.236.154.2 (talkcontribs) 15:29, 24 March 2008

This is a shoddy article that mischaracterizes EO 13303 as somehow protecting US oil companies. It does not. The plain language of the EO, which this article does not quote, says that all Iraqi petroleum and petroleum products, interests therein, etc., "in which any foreign country or a national thereof has any interest," and that are in the United States or in the possession or control of United States persons, are immune from attachment or other judicial process. If it was part of some "broader endeavor by the Bush administration to exert control over Iraqi oil revenues" as the article asserts, why has President Obama extended it every year since he has been in office, most recently on May 17, 2013? See http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/17/message-continuation-national-emergency-respect-stabilization-iraq. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.116.212.23 (talk) 20:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Executive Order 13303. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:35, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]