Talk:Fastra II

The good article status of this article is being reassessed to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page.

^{Date: 04:13, 11 May 2025 (UTC)}

Fastra II has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 7, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed
October 19, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed
January 31, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Belgium Mid‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please reword the article, it's not a supercomputer

The article needs rewording as it is not a supercomputer and gives the wrong impression. A supercomputer, as also linked to from the article, is several orders of magnitude more powerful than this box. It is also not a custom design, but uses common desktop components that anyone with a decent budget can build in a single case. 12 TFLOPS is not the kind of processing power a supercomputer has, that is measured in PFLOPS.

It's a powerful calculator, certainly, but a far cry from what it claims to be (regardless of what the media has called it).

Wolfbeast (talk) 09:50, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree; first, it says "desktop super computer" which differentiates it from regular super computers. Also, it is a custom design like all modern super computers:

Today, parallel designs are based on "off the shelf" server-class microprocessors, such as the PowerPC, Opteron, or Xeon, and coprocessors like NVIDIA Tesla GPGPUs, AMD GPUs, IBM Cell, FPGAs. Most[which?] modern supercomputers are now highly-tuned computer clusters using commodity processors combined with custom interconnects.

cheers --DeVerm (talk) 17:05, 16 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Grammar errors

Under "Applications and reception": "Fastra II relies on Nvidia's Scalable Link Interface (SLI) and is therefore limited to the number of GPUs supported by it and also by the vendor respectively the free and open-source device drivers"

The last part of the sentence makes no sense to me; what is it trying to say? --BeanSprugget (talk) 18:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

This older GA (2011), whose nominator has been blocked for socking, has significant sourcing issues - there is a fair proportion of uncited text and the article is very heavily reliant on sources from the company selling this product. I do not believe the sourcing here is up to the modern standard. If these concerns are not addressed, the article should go to WP:GAR. Hog Farm _Talk 02:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]