Talk:Foreign policy of the Masoud Pezeshkian administration

Iran High‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Launchballer talk 12:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian was the first Iranian president to visit Iraqi Kurdistan?

Source: https://www.newarab.com/news/iranian-president-pezeshkian-visits-iraqi-kurdistan

ALT1: ... that Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian was the first Iranian president to attend the 16th BRICS summit following its admission? Source: https://en.irna.ir/news/85637049/BRICS-summit-opens-in-Russia-s-Kazan-with-Iran-s-president-in
Reviewed:
Comment: First article. I think i've done it right. Just not sure which is the most catch title.
there is an image of him on his main page, maybe someone can add it it this?

Created by Sportsnut24 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Sportsnut24 (talk) 13:45, 23 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Comment from NPP reviewer: Sportsnut24, you should properly format your references using Template:Cite web, instead of simply putting a URL between ref tags. I have left a maintenance template on the article and done one for you – simply follow this format for the others. Best, Toadspike [Talk] 11:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I would also note that per the (now deprecated) supplementary guideline D3, that bare URLs should generally not be used for articles, especially when it gets nominated for DYK/GA/FA. JuniperChill (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It's actually listed at the latest guidelines at WP:DYKCITE JuniperChill (talk) 15:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sportsnut24: Did you resolve the above concern, and is this ready for a review? Z1720 (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JuniperChill: WP:PRESSTV policy is itself based on a deprecated source. Ergo, there is no policy.Sportsnut24 (talk) 12:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused with what your saying, or you got confused with what you said. While this isn't a full review, deprecated sources are almost never used in articles (Daily Mail is a notable example, and so is Press TV), and are likely not permitted for DYK and you even pointed it out to yourself. I suggest removing them. Another user will give a proper review. JuniperChill (talk) 18:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let's make it clear I'm requesting a review from another user. JuniperChill (talk) 10:29, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sportsnut24: Please address the above.--Laun chba ller 12:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator has not edited since the 24th and has not responded to the above concerns. Marking for closure, without prejudice against the nomination resuming if they return or the nom is adopted. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS

MOS:OFFICE is clear --> "when used generically" + "capitalized only in the following cases". Literally in the MOS that YOU cited.

A disruptive editor cites it and then being disruptive. When reverted, he/she/they/them/it has to go to talk when reverted.Sportsnut24 (talk) 12:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did your arguement change? Discuss it here first before changing!Sportsnut24 (talk) 12:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated source

A disruptive editor keep citing a "policy based on a deprecated source. ADL has already been proved to be unreliable by WP. When reverted, go to the talk page and stop being disruptive.Sportsnut24 (talk) 12:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]