Talk:GameTZ.com

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Delete, 14 February 2007, see discussion.
Overturn, 20 February 2007, see discussion.

Older deletion discussions:
No Consensus, 16 May 2007, see discussion. Bad faith nomination, 31 May 2007, see discussion. Keep, 27 July 2007, see discussion. Speedy Keep, 23 September 2007, see discussion.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

EGM mention

I added refs for the EGM mention. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 05:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Creator

If anything, Osborne's name should be removed, not Marrs'. Osborne had nothing to do with GameTZ as it exists today. His site consisted of him maintaining user lists by hand, and more little resemblance to GameTZ. What you're proposing is like saying Dave Thomas didn't create Wendy's, because McDoanld's existed first. Stop trolling and go back to GameTZ, CaptColon.... Dstumme (talk) 11:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's just the same guy that has a personal vendetta against GameTZ. Here's what'll happen: He'll delete references, he'll nominate it for AFD, he'll be shocked to find out that while administrators are not too bright, they will notice the history of bad faith noms and shut it down immediately, then he'll leave in a huff after the article is protected for a month. There's no reasoning with an obsessed child. 216.37.86.10 (talk) 14:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not so sure. At least some of this is coming from members of the site, playing pranks, not the AfD-obsessed troll we had before. Dstumme (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Top 5 Trading Sites?

I am looking at the November 2007 issue of EGM right now and I can't find the listings of the top 5 trading sites. Is there a page number to look at? Page 40 as cited is an ad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.254.216 (talk) 15:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page 40 seems to be accurate. See [1] for example. dstumme (talk) 19:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will add that link in with the piece, but I removed the issue date, as it is definitely not November 2007. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.254.216 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was in the Holiday 2007 article. Adding that in now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.254.216 (talk) 22:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]