Jump to content

Talk:Gaylor (theory)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On article title

[edit]

Are we sure that "(theory)" alone is sufficient in the title? To me, at least, moving to "Gaylor (conspiracy theory)" would be more appropriate, given that is exactly how RSs describe this topic (as can be seen in the article's citations). JavaHurricane 18:54, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even if RS refers to it as such it is objectively not a conspiracy theory, it is a fringe theory. Either way I think "theory" is more than sufficient to differentiate this article from other articles with Gaylor in the title, all of which either refer to a person by the name Gaylor or a place. Tekrmn (talk) 04:54, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]