Talk:Grandhi Mallikarjuna Rao

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Reads like a vanity page... I'm sure someone who is extraordinarily wealthy, particularly in India, has some critics and negative history. If not, it should be proven with additional references outside of a Forbes Top XXXX list. Avruch ^Talk 00:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that keeping wikipedia standards is important and I appreciate the job. But please do not include comments as the above comment "Negative History" "Particularly in india" with out quoting any sources.I have added few more references other than Forbes. This reference include 'International Herald Tribune [1]. I welcome any move towards improving the standards of article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srinadh.munipalli (talk • contribs) 01:14, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have also edited the content and removed adjectives and reduced tone, as a response to the 'nuetrality disputed' tag.Srinadh.munipalli

Sources are required for articles not talk pages. Your contributions, to this article and any others, are appreciated by the community. Please use four tildes to sign your comments. Avruch ^Talk 04:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion looks a little stale, but I would point out to Avruch that in your first comment you are asking for proof of a negative. The article is perhaps written with a personally invested tone, but if you are so sure this guy has a "negative history" then the burden is on you to produce the evidence. Good Luck Beeblbrox (talk) 13:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He is a great man. Persons like him should live healthy for a long time to bring up a wealthy India. Best wishes and respects and eegards. Venkiteswaran, Nemmara. Palakad, Kerala Enkevi (talk) 21:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vanity Page

I agree with the comment that this page reads like a "Vanity Page". This page looks as if it was written by the namesake or by someone close to Grandhi rao. I think that this page should be deleted because it really has no merit on Wikipedia. If not, then someone capitalize his last name in the title. I would but I don't know how. Chexmix53 (talk) 21:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grandhi Mallikarjuna Rao. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]