Jump to content

Talk:Great Union Day

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Union Day (of Romania) and Unification Day (of Bulgaria) should be turned into a disambig. :-) bogdan 15:56, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled 2

[edit]
In Romanian this day is called the "Great Union Day" ("Ziua Marii Uniri"), as opposed to "Union Day" ("Ziua Unirii") celebrated on 24 January. --Alex:D ([[Uspula de darius


er talk:Alex:D|talk]]) 19:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Merger proposal

[edit]

I added the template for merging, since in the other article's discussion page users agreed on merge but it is still not done.--Desyman44 (talk) 20:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, note that the discussion in the other article was in 2007 in order to separate the article into two: one for the historic event, and the other for Romania's national day. Thank you very much for providing more sources there. As for this article, I believe it should be expanded with the traditions and customs that exist when the National Day is celebrated, while the reference to historic events is there. That article is part of Category:History of Romania. This article is in Category:National days and Category:Romanian society. It should be removed from the history category. (IMHO) Dc76\talk 05:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1dec1918.jpg nominated for deletion

[edit]

See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2014_June_20 Avpop (talk) 08:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Union Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Union Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Modern

[edit]

@Super Dromaeosaurus:, "Modern" refers here first modern unified Romanian state, in 1859, which cannot be present-day Romania, (1989-). The article I linked clearly means what the context refers, as the United Principalities were created then, and shortly renamed to Romania. Hence I really do not understand your revert...please fix this somehow, as well you may remove the two red links (main article and from the sentence, which anyway intended to refer to the article I linked, or fix them and remove the wikilink from present-day Romania. Thank You(KIENGIR (talk) 18:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, I added that part with the intention of referring to current Romania. If the context meant the United Principalities, it would have said something like "the first modern Romanian state". I really do not intend to dispute which of the two states should be linked, so you can add the link to the United Principalities again if you change the wording, but it is just that I consider that the current version refers more to post-1989 Romania. And regarding removing those two red links, I object to that, they have the potential to become an article and in fact I intend to do so at some point in the future. Super Ψ Dro 18:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Super Dromaeosaurus:,
I see, if so I don't intend to change anything without your agreement so it means you do no consider the United Principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia article will/would cover the possibe Unification of the Romanian Principalities, so they will not be redundant? Please as well clarify what wording and how I should change to be able to add the link, or you may present some proposals as well (also mind that present-day Romania could be as well referred as contemporary, per the modern history article definition, however could be ambigous in historical context, I agree).(KIENGIR (talk) 19:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC))[reply]
Yes, I think the unification of Moldavia and Wallachia should have their own article. It already has one on several Wikipedias [1], and it is a GA on the Ukrainian Wikipedia AND the Russian one too. We could use "contemporary" in order to refer to the current Romania, but I feel like it's a bit strange for the prose, so to link the United Principalities it would be enough to change "Modern [[Romania]] appeared" with "The [[United Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia|first modern Romanian state]] appeared" (I'd place the link there but that's your choice). Super Ψ Dro 19:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The source says very clearly: Cuza’s election was an important step in “the creation of the modern Romanian state”. That state was formed in 1859 and continues to this day. It’s distinct from the pre-modern Romanian states of Moldavia, Wallachia etc. These are basic facts upon which all relevant historiography is agreed. We have consensus for linking to Romania. End of debate. Thanks, and have a peaceful Sunday. — Biruitorul Talk 19:54, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Great_Union_Day&oldid=1248977109"