Talk:HLM

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HLM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131126045403/http://www.convergence-lr.fr/evenement/1/hlm-ideesrecues-2012.pdf to http://www.convergence-lr.fr/evenement/1/hlm-ideesrecues-2012.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Monday - Spring 2024 HIST 401

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2024 and 13 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jawgarci, Uortiz99 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Uortiz99 (talk) 22:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand the addition of this "Statistics" section

I have seen that a section called "Statistics" has been added to the article, but there are many problems with it. Firstly, the 2018 column has figures that are not in the source used. It is difficult to know whether the book used as a source for the 2010 column contains the figures it is supposed to contain (without the exact page it is difficult to check), but it is quite unlikely as such figures look inconsistent. Moreover, I do not understand the relevance of this table for the article: is there a context? Is there something in the article that requires it? It looks like user @Tweedle is the one who added it. Could you explain, please ? Eleventh1 (talk) 21:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should I just delete the "Statistics" section ? @Tweedle? Eleventh1 (talk) 20:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not responding sooner, The statistics are on those with a nationality background who live in HLMs out of a total of their group. It would be nice if we could find stuff on the total number of HLMs etc. but I have just added what I have on me.

I am not sure what you mean by the 2018 column has figures that are not in the source, please let me know if the source is going to the wrong place, it should look like this (on a Google translated version). The statistics are again as what is described in above sentence

I can provide the figures for 1990 (you can obtain a copy of the book yourself via alternative means if needed), please see here, page 71.

I am not sure also what you mean by they look inconsistent, the percentages stay roughly the same over the 30 year time period for most of the groups bar like 3 which see, relatively, a good amount of increase or decrease. On context, I don't think any is needed? The previous section on history is already adequate to this I would have thought, but you can add stuff if you want. Tweedle (talk) 08:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer.

OK, I think I now understand the figures in the two columns. You're right : the numbers are indeed in the source, sorry for jumping to conclusions. It's just that I didn't understand what the percentage was being compared to. If I may say so, I don't think it's very clear yet.

If I could suggest some changes, I would add the line for the European Community (with an extra "/European Union") after Portugal, Spain and Italy rather than before, so as not to give the impression that the other European line is other than just Spain, Italy and Portugal. I think you should also mention that the percentage of households in HLMs is compared to the total number of permanent residents in each group.

I saw that the social housing stock in 1990 was about 4 million out of 22 million dwellings in France, which seems to indicate that higher figures than the ones in the tables, but that may be because there are other forms of social housing than HLM (I am not sure).

For the "Monthly rent over time in HLMs" table you have added, you should also mention that it is an average. Eleventh1 (talk) 14:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, have added these changes in (apart from the 4 mil HLM figure, if you can find where that was I can check but I imagine it may be some other form of the social housing as you said, to be fair the report in the table comes from a group which has done a fair amount on HLM statistics). I'll likely add some more stuff in tommorow on the proportion of dwellings which are HLMs by region over time but at the moment it looks good as it is. Tweedle (talk) 19:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]