Jump to content

Talk:Hearken to the Witches Rune

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk00:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the title of the album Hearken to the Witches Rune has been both dismissed as pretentious and described as a key to its appeal? Source: "There are many good things here, of which the title, the most pretentious I have seen for a long time, is not one." (Roy Palmer, English Dance & Song 1971, p. 118) "'... Hearken to the witches' rune...' The fact that it's not actually sung on the album, but only printed on the back cover and used in the title indicates its significance for the couple and its perceived appropriatedness for a folk album. Indeed, the text printed on the cover serves to transform the record into a sacred artifact, the implication being that the album's true significance lies beyond mere entertainment." (Christopher Partridge, The Lyre of Orpheus 2014, pp. 147-148)

Created by Ffranc (talk). Self-nominated at 14:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Both hooks look reasonably interesting and I think either would be perfectly fine. I think my preference if I had to chose would be ALT1 (the source being online helps as well) but perfectly happy to go with either! Turnagra (talk) 09:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]