Jump to content

Talk:History of Belfast

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

It would be good to have some post-WWII stuff other than that on the Troubles. Presumably while the Troubles were happening normal city things were still going on - development, expansion into the hinterlands, patterns of industry etc. This article reinforces the idea that Irish history is nothing but Prods and Catholics killing each other. --Helenalex 06:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Avenue Belfast2.jpg to appear as POTD soon

[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Royal Avenue Belfast2.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 30, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-11-30. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng {chat} 18:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Avenue, Belfast, 1890s
A photochrom print of Royal Avenue in Belfast, Northern Ireland, from the 1890s. In the 19th century, Belfast became Ireland's pre-eminent industrial city, and saw an influx of immigration, made up of mostly Catholics into a predominantly Protestant city. Sectarian tensions remained high throughout the years, with no major incidents having taken place since 1998's Belfast Agreement.Image: Detroit Publishing Co.; Restoration: Lise Broer
Archive – More featured pictures...

See Also

[edit]

I suggest adding a See Also section to link to other relevent Wikipedia articles. Example contents might include;

etc.

Peeeeet (talk) 03:49, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All the edits I made were from my notes from a radio program on the BBC that was converted into an Audible Kylecholmes (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Belfast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Belfast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

[edit]

The source is actually an audio book through Audible that was originally broadcast on BBC Radio. It was written by an historian so I cited him and the radio program. Kylecholmes (talk) 21:38, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I noticed it was available on Amazon. Is it not split into episodes? The original series appears to be 120 episodes, the Amazon pages talks about "240 short documentaries". They really need to be individually cited, rather than expecting someone to guess where in the nearly 24 hours of audio the information can be found. FDW777 (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

[edit]

I was citing per episode when something amalgamated all my refs together Kylecholmes (talk) 21:52, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:22, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Questioned text

[edit]

The history section contains the following: “the marshy ford where the River Lagan met the River Farset (the name comes from the Irish Béal Feirste which translates to "Mouth of the River Farset") “. Since the parenthesis seems to say that the name of the river Farset comes from an Irish name meaning “mouth of the river Farset”, this seems a bit circular and so I will remove the parenthesis pending clarification Elinruby (talk) 02:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Queen visited

[edit]

This gets way more attention than almost anything else. It seems a bit UNDUE to me, but possibly that’s just me. Currently not I am not addressing structure, but perhaps someone should. Comments? Elinruby (talk) 12:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The visit of the king a couple of decades later seems more directly related to actual events however. Elinruby (talk) 21:22, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes from copy-edit

[edit]

I just went all the way through the article on a first pass. I am leaving the tags up as I am not convinced I got all of the problems. I am somewhat interested in the topic and will probably be back for a second pass, but meanwhile here are some observations in case they help anyone else working on this.

  • I believe at least one editor was using speech to text on a phone, so watch for this. For example, the past tense of “to lead” is led not lead. This one appeared repeatedly but there were some others, including Stormont as Storming.
  • Generally the rule is that a topic is wikilinked only once per article, even one as long as this. I particularly noticed that Sinn Féin, Michael Collins and UVF were repeatedly linked, and got some of this, but not all.
  • I am not certain that I agree with the off-topic assessment, but as previously mentioned have so far primarily focused on a sentence by sentence edit.
  • the heavy reliance on the BBC documentary has probably helped to make this article much more even-handed than many other articles about sectarian strife, but makes the references harder to verify. Thank you to whoever broke these up by episode, btw, but it would be good to add more print references. There is nothing wrong with using these episodes, at all, as the BBC is an excellent source on the whole and the requirement for sources is only that they be verifiable, not easily verifiable, but given the contentious nature of the topic some more easily-verifiable sources would be good.
  • The “who” tag I left in several places is an objection to the use of such constructions as “It is believed that”, as they can obscure important information about who exactly it is that believes this, perhaps as a result of their own affiliations. These seem to occur primarily where the BBC documentary is cited, and may come from there, but it isn’t enough to just provide a reference that unnamed people believe something. Resolving this will need to be done on a case by case basis, but elsewhere in the article there are discussions of how loyalists or republicans reacted to given events, and these are just fine when referenced. Saying things like “some historians have written”, with a reference, is one way to at least somewhat improve this issue, which may seem like a pedantic quibble but really is not in an article about such painful topics.
  • Also, I assume we are using Irish English for this article, and since I am not from either Ireland or Northern Ireland it is possible that some of the small changes I made of wording that sounded wrong to me (“in” the grounds of city hall to “on” the grounds, for example) might stem from my own unfamiliarity , and if this is the case I have no objection to someone changing these back. Meanwhile I have assumed that overall the preferred spelling of words like “centre” is what I would call British Elinruby (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BY_SA 3.0

[edit]

English language 206.84.161.18 (talk) 14:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

English language

[edit]

Where we live 206.84.161.18 (talk) 14:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Belfast&oldid=1207550376"