Talk:Howard Chaykin

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Comics: Creators / United States Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Cleanup

It should be painfully obvious to anyone reading it, but the article has never been spellchecked or proofread and is in dire need of it. Could anyone responsible for contributing to this article please clean it up? Canonblack 23:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cleanup :

I didn't write the original article but I've hammered the wayward grammar into better shape, I hope. ;-) ...EDIT: Chronology of the 1990s section seems a little out of order, given that Chaykin's scripting duties on "The Flash" TV series (1990) preceded his Malibu Comics title, Power And Glory (1993-94). The article also doesn't mention his Cyberella work (1995?) -- see Wikipedia's Helix_(comics) entry. ~ [User: Not logged in. 12:38, April 11, 2006.]

Fair use rationale for Image:Blackkiss7.jpg

Image:Blackkiss7.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Starwarschaykin.jpg

Image:Starwarschaykin.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:American flagg2.jpg

Image:American flagg2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Starbuck

Why does Cody Starbuck in this article redirect back to this very article, and yet there is nothing here about Cody Starbuck. Needs its own page, or a red-link/no article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.61.26.164 (talk) 15:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: American Flagg! Relaunch

It's probably a minor point that only I care about, but is it worth mentioning in the article that Chaykin fought for the second American Flagg! series to begin with #1? Per Rick Oliver's First Notes column , First's editorial director at the time, First wanted to keep the original numbering and label Amerikan Flagg! #51 and the delay between American #50 and Amerikan #1 was due to Chaykin not wanting to go forward with the project unless he could "start over" to distance the second series from the original. I think it goes to show he cares a bit more about his creations than some other creators might, butting heads with his publisher over what many would surely consider a trivial point. 64.222.94.132 (talk) 20:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure whether this shows that he "cares" more - but that he is more stubborn about getting his own way, perhaps ? -- Beardo (talk) 05:03, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars adaption

I recall that Chaykin did most if not all of the film adaption but didn't carry on. Did he "leave" or was he only contracted for that ? - Beardo (talk) 05:13, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Monark Starstalker

Monark Starstalker is a fictional Marvel character and is a bounty hunter. The character was first featured in Marvel Premiere (October-Number 32)1976) and was created by Howard Chaykin,somewhat based upon previous character,such as Ironwolf and Cody Starbuck.

I undid this recent addition. I'm not saying it doesn't belong in the article, but it certainly doesn't fit where Mavericstud9 (talk · contribs) put it. —Tamfang (talk) 06:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monark Starstalker has his own article, by the way, from which that passage was pasted. —Tamfang (talk) 06:53, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Howard Chaykin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=37084
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130621081809/http://www.heroinitiative.org/spage.asp?p=73&ti=Board+Members to http://www.heroinitiative.org/spage.asp?p=73&ti=Board+Members

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing stories and story order

I've been adding some of the Cheykin stories this article missed, and I note that the DC titles are alphabetical while the Marvel titles are chronological. I really don't care which order is used, but it should be consistent. Does anyone have a preference? Rick Norwood (talk) 19:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I mentioned that for World of Krypton, Chaykin did only the art (Paul Kupperberg did the script). It was reverted as "unnecessary" and yet other entries in the same list mention whether Chaykin did only the script or both script and art. Why not in this case? Rick Norwood (talk) 13:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because the default assumption is that he did the art. A notation is only required if he was also (or only) the writer. Rcarter555 (talk) 15:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. Because I think of Chaykin as a writer/artist, I had not noticed that assumption. Rick Norwood (talk) 22:05, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]