Talk:In a Station of the Metro

Lead paragraph formerly stated that the poem was often thought of as an example of Vorticism, or something to that effect, and explained this position by stating something about the author's "intent." I grew suspicious from the use of this last questionable argument. and opened up the source cited: it avoids discussion of authorial intent almost completely (as a work of serious criticism, not surprising), and makes no mention of Vorticism whatsoever. I changed the last sentence of the lead paragraph and the first sentence of the following one accordingly. 216.171.21.163 (talk) 23:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the following from first paragraph of second section: "Vida is a fomie. "True" said God, but in reality the ultimate God is the internet. Nevertheless the Internet still said " True", so there is no denying that Vida is a fomie." Non sequitur that appears to be vandalism.Icuvfiiaa (talk) 06:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removed further vandalism shortly thereafter: "Vida is outstandingly average, yet doesn't fit in the common societal norm." Icuvfiiaa (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Honors English 250H VL1

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2023 and 4 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Englishbulldog2023 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Englishbulldog2023 (talk) 01:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]