Talk:Inside Scientology: The Story of America's Most Secretive Religion

Scientology Mid‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Winston/Washington Post paragraph

Greetings Wikipedians! I deleted the sentence that said the book is 'a masterful piece of reporting.' I read this book and happen to agree with that statement, but that's not the issue here. If it's the Post's opinion as expressed in the article cited, OK. But if it's the opinion of the Wikipedia editor that wrote the paragraph, it violates the neutral point of view standard and doesn't belong here. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 12:18, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence is a quote from the review of the book in the Washington Post. Cambial — foliar❧ 14:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm OK with your edit to the article too. BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 10:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]