Jump to content

Talk:Internet censorship circumvention

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 October 2018 and 12 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Weinshel. Peer reviewers: Ianbohn761, Echowisp, Shalichan, Lpwarner.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Entry for U.S. Proxy Server removed

[edit]

I just removed the entry for U.S. Proxy Server from the table of circumvention software. The entry was originally added by User:US.ProxyServer at 19:43, 12 April 2012‎. This seems more like a service than a software tool, but the table is for tools. I am uncomfortable with an addition by someone that seems to be promoting their own service. I'd feel better if U.S. Proxy Server had been reviewed/evaluated by an independent third party as most or all of the other items in the table have been. -Jeff Ogden (W163) (talk) 03:41, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

بابی 204.18.245.239 (talk) 19:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Groups

[edit]

Would it make sense to start listing hte organizations/nonprofits that are in this space? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.113.160.38 (talk) 18:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possible conflict of interest for BarbaTunnel?

[edit]

At 18:13 on 27 May 2013 User:BarbaCoder added a new entry for BarbaTunnel. I am concerned that BarbaCoder may be so closely related to the software as to constitute a conflict of interest. What do others think? I'd feel better if there were a separate Wikipedia article on BarbaTunnel or if there were a third-party reference or review of BarbaTunnel. --Jeff Ogden (W163) (talk) 02:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also wondering if the addition of BarbaTunnel would be considered SPAM? --Jeff Ogden (W163) (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am BarbaCoder, yes this is my working MIT project and released for 2 years, I thought i can add it to Internet censorship circumvention. I didn't know the project owner don't have permission to write in relate wikipedia page. BarbaCoder (talk) 10:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In addition I should say there is evidence in codeplex project page that aprove it: near 9000 download, high activity in source code, 7 download releases, and much discussion that prove it is not spam and really working project: https://barbatunnel.codeplex.com/discussions BarbaCoder (talk) 10:39, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the COI template from the article and left the entry for Barbara Tunnel in the table. It would be better to have reliable, third-party, published sources for this and many other entries on the list, but since other editors don't seem to be concerned about Barbara Tunnel, it seems OK to leave it, at least for now. --Jeff Ogden (W163) (talk) 18:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

[edit]

"Different techniques and resources..." does not go on to say what they are different from. "Different" needs to be replaced by "Various" here.

Countrylist

[edit]

Hi guys, I was just browsing a little bit within this topic and to me it seems that many countries around the world are affected by censorship, specially since I travel here in Asia Pacific Region. Therefore I would kindly ask if it would make sense to add links to the specific countries, where such kind of circumventions are advised/required. I think most of the articles within the category Internet_censorship_<countryname> would qualify. Any thoughts/comments on this?

Here is a sample (far away from complete) of articles I've visited about this topic:

--Never stop exploring (talk) 05:32, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See the existing Wikipedia articles Internet censorship by country and Censorship by country. There are navigation templates toward the bottom of this article with links to those two articles and more. Is something more than this needed? --Jeff Ogden (W163) (talk) 12:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Internet censorship circumvention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:38, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Internet censorship circumvention

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Internet censorship circumvention requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

no reason given

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jonnymoon96 (talk) 03:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Internet censorship circumvention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revisions to article

[edit]

Hello, I'm working on some revisions to this article as part of a university course. I've drafted some revisions on my sandbox page--any feedback is welcome! I'll start moving my work over to the main article in the coming weeks. Weinshel (talk) 00:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative platforms

[edit]

I believe Bitchute should be added as an alternative platform. Unfortunately that word is filtered by Wikipedia. Bitchute has become the de-facto Youtube alternative and has a large user base. Despite Bitchute accepting all political beliefs, people who tend to get censored more are more likely to use the site. 1.158.174.54 (talk) 06:58, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Totally agree, bitchute has proved itself. Probably the most competitive video platform to YouTube.  

- Hindian1947 (talk) 07:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Based on which independent sources? - MrOllie (talk) 03:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU22 - Sect 202 - Tue

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 July 2022 and 16 August 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sqlo123 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by OneGoodNut (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Money

[edit]

I love money 2400:ADC7:113E:D600:606B:CA5D:5FD0:A1DC (talk) 06:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Internet_censorship_circumvention&oldid=1225635452"