Talk:Intraplate volcanism

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Intraplate volcanism is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge, as the topics are sufficiently distinct and readers benefit from separate coverage. Klbrain (talk) 15:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I formally propose to merge Mantle plume and Plate theory (volcanism) into Intraplate volcanism. Intraplate volcanism was created from the full content of both Mantle plume and Plate theory (volcanism) per this discussion at Wikiproject Geology, where a consensus was reached that having separate pages on two theories that are in tension was undesirable compared with discussing both theories on a single page. See the discussion there for the full reasoning behind this proposal. Although plate theory is probably a minority position within geology, we have identified reliable sources that are "orthodox", so to speak, but nonetheless take plate theory seriously, so it appears that it is by no means a fringe theory.

Although Intraplate volcanism already contains the full content of both articles on the competing theories, we thought it appropriate to go through the formalities of a merge proposal rather than just be bold and replace both child articles with redirects, so that any interested editor who did not participate in the Wikiproject Geology discussion can have an opportunity to chime in before we do the redirection. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 17:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this suggestion. I have looked the intraplate volcanism page. The material describing the plate theory for volcanism is well done. Nevertheless, it is still necessary to have a separate page on Plate theory (volcanism). The "intraplate volcanism" page continues to present plume theory as the dominant theory and plate theory as an "alternative". This leading presentation discourages researchers from weighing up the pros and cons of both theories personally. In addition, the volcanism in question is not always "intraplate", e.g., Iceland, Azores, Bouvet, Afar etc. Thus, the title of the page is inappropriate. There is a page titled "Mantle plume". It is thus appropriate to have one titled "Plate theory (volcanism)". To relegate Plate theory to the second half of a very long "Intraplate volcanism" page would be for Wikipedia to lead scientific thinking in a way that does not reflect the trend of current research.Gfoulger (talk) 22:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose merging mantle plume into intraplate volcanism simply because it would be a bit awkward. Not all mantle plumes have been projected to occur away from plate boundaries. For example, there's Iceland which sits on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, and the Azores which are adjacent to the Azores Triple Junction. Volcanoguy 03:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose merging mantle plume into intraplate volcanism It would be unwise to merge these pages when they are each required to present alternate theories of the same topic. While it can be shown that plume volcanism is clearly present at some locations (Hawaii) it is also shown that intraplate volcanism is also powered by plate stagnation in other locations (Mt. Paektu). Both theories have a places in presenting the full compliment of volcanic mechanisms. It should not therefore be commonplace for wikipedia articles to be edited, created, deleted or merged based upon opinion versus widely accepted theoretical consensus.TungstenCarbideProjectile (talk) 14:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Magmatism in the western US past 65 myr.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]