Jump to content

Talk:Isotopes of terbium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of terbium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible alpha decay of 155Tb and 157Tb

[edit]

The alpha decay energy of 155Tb (N = 90) is only 0.98 MeV, so the expected alpha half-life is very long. The decay energy is lower than 1.96 MeV of its alpha product 151Eu, 1.60 MeV of its double alpha product 147Pm and 1.73 MeV of its triple alpha product 143Pr. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 01:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC) Cristiano Toàn (talk) 05:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC) The alpha decay energy of 157Tb is even lower only about 0.18 MeV thus the half-life would be very long[reply]

Terbium-174?

[edit]

NUBASE2020 marks the existence of 174Tb according to a 2018 paper. I don't know how to include it here with the calculated values, though. Reconrabbit 20:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Terbium-149 is interesting

[edit]

It is the one of the only two nuclides with Z ≤ 83 that have use in radiotherapy because their alpha decays. We know that some nuclides with Z ≤ 83 do can undergo alpha decay, but most of them either have too short or too long alpha half-lives (even 148Gd with 86.9 years is too long for radiotherapy; however, 148Gd can be useful in generating radiopower), or have negligible alpha decay branches.

If one check the section Radionuclides with half-lives of 1 hour to 1 day of the page List of nuclides, then they can see that only two nuclides with Z ≤ 83 in this section have significant alpha decays: one is 149Tb (half-life 4.118 h, alpha branch ≈ 1/6), the other is 212Bi (half-life 60.55 min, alpha branch 35.94%). 129.104.241.55 (talk) 18:37, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See Theranostic Terbium Radioisotopes: Challenges in Production for Clinical Application and A heavy-ion production channel of 149Tb via 63Cu bombardment of 89Y. 129.104.241.55 (talk) 18:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]