Talk:JD Vance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the JD Vance article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about JD Vance. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about JD Vance at the Reference desk. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
On 18 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from J. D. Vance to JD Vance. The result of the discussion was moved. |
There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article, in a manner that does not comply with Wikipedia's policies. Editors are encouraged to use neutral mechanisms for requesting outside input (e.g. a "request for comment", a third opinion or other noticeboard post, or neutral criteria: "pinging all editors who have edited this page in the last 48 hours"). If someone has asked you to provide your opinion here, examine the arguments, not the editors who have made them. Reminder: disputes are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2024, when it received 23,985,531 views. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 9 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 January 2025
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
suggest in section regarding bills sponsored and cosponsored by Vice President Elect Vance to also cite the number of bills co-sponsored in the Tallahassee Democrat article (https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/politics/2025/01/07/jd-vance-name-changes-how-old-marine-vet-hillbilly-elegy-netflix-usha/77504596007/) TheFactualist (talk) 07:55, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- This information is already in the first paragraph under Tenure ("sponsored 57 legislative bills", "co-sponsored 288 bills") so what is it you are seeking to add? Is it just to add the Tallahassee Democrat as a reference? LizardJr8 (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. LizardJr8 (talk) 00:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 January 2025
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to change the main photo of JD Vance to his new Vice Presidential portrait. I think this cropped version would be best (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:VancePortrait(cropped).jpg). Thank you! BrendonUrie4 (talk) 21:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Looks like this image has been nominated for deletion. Not really a good idea to fulfil this request until we find out the outcome of that. Oh, and also, here's the correct link (without a closing bracket at the end): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:VancePortrait(cropped).jpg MadGuy7023 (talk) 21:57, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done. No evidence that this image has been released under a free licence. -- zzuuzz (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is now the official portrait for JD Vance on WhiteHouse.gov 6218946rr (talk) 18:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- That does not matter. The White House cannot steal the copyright from a private photographer. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 18:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is now public domain. As it is "work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties" Hexonite (talk) 18:48, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- That does not matter. The White House cannot steal the copyright from a private photographer. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 18:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is now the official portrait for JD Vance on WhiteHouse.gov 6218946rr (talk) 18:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 January 2025 (2)
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hard-trump-vance-release-official-portraits/story?id=117760860 Edit photo to reflect new, official portrait. Proof of new portraits in link above. I can't upload the portrait myself. Additionally, somebody else suggested a cropped version of his portrait. I suggest the full, original version be used on this page. Andbmccu (talk) 00:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done. No evidence that this image has been released under a free licence. -- zzuuzz (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- 75px Portrait has been uploaded into public domain on official account of U.S. representative Warren Davidson. Rochambeau1783 (talk) 02:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done A congressperson cannot "steal" copyright from the photographer, who has not released it into public domain. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 06:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- 75px Portrait has been uploaded into public domain on official account of U.S. representative Warren Davidson. Rochambeau1783 (talk) 02:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 January 2025
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
1 : Tag any untagged words that have an article about it on Wikipedia
2 : I will try to find and fix as many grammar issues as possible
3 : Change portrait to the newest one : File:J.D Vance Official portrait.jpg
(wait for copyright status to be clarified)
I'm sending this proposal to ask if i can edit the page of Vice president-elect JD Vance
as a result of Vance getting elected as vice-president of the United States
i want to help Wikipedia with editing his article since i started my account in September
but there is a problem i'm not an extended-confirmed user or administrator and because of this i can't edit it and since i want to help with editing it
im proposing the possibility for me to edit this article.
that's all for now, have a good day. MalborkHistorian (talk) 17:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done... Edit requests must be in the format of "Change X to Y", they are not the place to ask for additional permissions, try WP:PERM. - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- And linking words just because they have articles is MOS:OVERLINKING – Muboshgu (talk) 18:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Surname: Vance/Hance
[edit]Please do a thorough check and confirm the surname 'Vance' which could be 'Hance'.
Also, please confirm and do the same with the surname 'Bowman' which could be 'Borman'.
Thank you. Shellsjsmd1 (talk) 13:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neither Hance/Borman spellings exist in the current article. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 January 2025
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the current infobox image because it is a cropped version of one nominated for deletion. Noah, BSBATalk 17:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Someone removed it. Noah, BSBATalk 17:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
change the portrait!!
[edit]it is now public domain. Hexonite (talk) 18:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- No, it is not. Nobody, not even the President, can "steal" copyright from a private photographer. The private photographer has explicitly stated that he does not wish the images to be public domain. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 18:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- if that's the case, the portrait should be removed from donald trump's page CMBGAMER 2018 (talk) 19:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- "steal"?? it's not me that said it is "public domain". it's wikipedia that does so, AND even the deletion of the images has been suspended. Hexonite (talk) 19:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- The deletion was suspended by an admin who made the same mistake you did. License laundering is explicitly prohibited by Commons policy. This is a textbook case of license laundering. The image was confirmed to be copyrighted by the photographer, and so it is against Commons policy to "launder" it by using the fact it was posted on another website as its copyright status. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 19:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Edit request: JD Vance taking the oath of office
[edit]I believe Vance taking the vice presidential oath of office is important enough to be on the page: File:J.D Vance takes the vice presidential oath of office.webm CMBGAMER 2018 (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 January 2025 (2)
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the picture to Vance's official Vice President portrait. 75.133.50.198 (talk) 19:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done see above. This image is copyrighted by the photographer that took it and is not free to use on Wikipedia. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 19:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- For what it’s worth, the image is used as the profile picture of the official Vice President X account. May not change whether it can be used or not on Wikipedia though. MichaelM444 (talk) 19:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- The photos should be deleted off wikimedia Commons if that's the case PublicDomainFan08 (talk) 21:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Portrait Change
[edit]In my opinion the portrait should be changed to this : File:J.D Vance Official portrait.jpg
if you want to edit the information on it it then you can. MalborkHistorian (talk) 20:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support - just for any future disagreements for this common-sense change. JParksT2023 (talk) 20:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - Hopefully we can change it, when the official veep image is available. GoodDay (talk) 16:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oh my goodness the photo is so bad 😭. I'm not sure of Wikipedia's policy on this but are we required to keep a photograph as the infobox portrait just because it is the most recent official one? The 2023 one isn't really all that old and looks so much better. EytanMelech (talk) 18:38, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- For now, I'd use the 2023 image. GoodDay (talk) 21:14, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- We're not required, but it's traditional, and consistently doing so where possible can be seen as a helpful "rule." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- He's not wearing a flagpin. Is that legal? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
“Has served” as 50th VP?
[edit]Shouldn’t this read “is serving”? I don’t get this. HockeyCowboy (talk) 20:31, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Since changes to "...serving as..." GoodDay (talk) 16:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- I prefer “is serving”. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:37, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- There's already an "is" in the sentence. I changed it from "has served as" to "serving as". BBQboffingrill me 03:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- I prefer “is serving”. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:37, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- "has served" is a grammatical trick some users use to make it easy to change when they leave office. You just remove the "has" when their term is up. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 03:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- That's years from now, and we shouldn't make things more confusing just for convenience. Wikieditor662 (talk) 03:53, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Typo
[edit]It says "during his four year of service...". I believe it should say "fourth" 46.5.255.137 (talk) 21:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant to write "During his four years of service". I think that's the correct sentence. 46.5.255.137 (talk) 21:37, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done... changed to "four years"... - Adolphus79 (talk) 22:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 January 2025
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change
Vice presidency (2025–present)
[edit]On January 20, 2025, Vance was sworn in as the 50th vice president of the United States.[1] Before his inauguration, Vance held a meeting with China's vice president Han Zheng in which they discussed China–United States relations.[2] Among his first acts as vice president was swearing in Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the first of Trump's cabinet nominees to be approved by Congress, on January 21.[3]
to, cite web reference for Marko Rubio's swearing in
Vice presidency (2025–present)
[edit]On January 20, 2025, Vance was sworn in as the 50th vice president of the United States.[4] Before his inauguration, Vance held a meeting with China's vice president Han Zheng in which they discussed China–United States relations.[5] Among his first acts as vice president was swearing in Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the first of Trump's cabinet nominees to be approved by Congress, on January 21.[6]
Amanoss (talk) 23:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for highlighting the bare url reference. Fixed. LizardJr8 (talk) 00:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
References
- ^ Woods, Ontaria (January 20, 2025). Watch: JD Vance sworn in as vice president. CNN. Retrieved January 20, 2025.
- ^ Wang, Orange (January 20, 2025). "Han and Vance strike positive tone for US-China ties ahead of Trump inauguration". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on January 20, 2025. Retrieved January 20, 2025.
- ^ https://nypost.com/2025/01/21/us-news/marco-rubio-sworn-in-as-secretary-of-state-as-cabinet-hearings-pick-up/.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ Woods, Ontaria (January 20, 2025). Watch: JD Vance sworn in as vice president. CNN. Retrieved January 20, 2025.
- ^ Wang, Orange (January 20, 2025). "Han and Vance strike positive tone for US-China ties ahead of Trump inauguration". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on January 20, 2025. Retrieved January 20, 2025.
- ^ "Marco Rubio sworn in as secretary of state as cabinet hearings pick up". New York Post. 2025-01-21. Retrieved 2025-01-22.
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 January 2025
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the word “elect” in the sentence “On January 24, he cast the tiebreaking vote to elect Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense.” to “confirm”.
Cabinet secretaries are not elected, they are appointed and either confirmed or rejected. HidyHoTim (talk) 04:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Someone else changed it as you requested. Thank you very much! Wikieditor662 (talk) 04:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 January 2025 (2)
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The vice president should be capitalized. 8.9.88.13 (talk) 15:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Ilovefood123123 (talk) 15:30, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 January 2025
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
'has served' obviously should be 'serves' 2407:4D00:2C05:84FE:B02A:6BB:8B94:54A4 (talk) 20:38, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done: not with "since 2025". Hyphenation Expert (talk) 22:53, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 February 2025
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Replace "Vance is an outspoken critic of childlessness and has acknowledged the influence of Catholic theology on his sociopolitical positions" With "Vance has acknowledged the influence of Catholic theology on his sociopolitical positions". Saying he is an "outspoken opponent of childlessness" and including that in the top section is completely exaggerated and unsourced Pajamahop (talk) 03:13, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{Edit extended-protected}}
template. It seems like a core part of who he is.[1] – Muboshgu (talk) 03:29, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Conservatism articles
- Mid-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- B-Class American politics articles
- High-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of High-importance
- B-Class United States presidential elections articles
- Mid-importance United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States presidential elections articles
- B-Class Ohio articles
- High-importance Ohio articles
- WikiProject Ohio articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class United States Presidents articles
- Unknown-importance United States Presidents articles
- B-Class Donald Trump articles
- Top-importance Donald Trump articles
- Donald Trump task force articles
- B-Class U.S. Congress articles
- Mid-importance U.S. Congress articles
- WikiProject U.S. Congress persons
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report