Talk:James Henthorn Todd

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Untitled

Created stub. Todd should have an article; he was a respected scholar. Notuncurious (talk) 03:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hang On

I don't think this is suitable for speedy deletion under A7 - have added link to the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography article. Would note a large number of hits for books by or mentioning this person [1] Think this could be expanded successfully will try and look back at it later if no one else does -Hunting dog (talk) 08:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He was a prolific writer with a number of notable contributions; I'm more interested in his works than his bio, but will fill out the article so as to avoid the suspicion that he was not notable (prefer that someone else did it, but that's unlikely). From the trivial stub that I created, the bot was in the right to be suspicious. Appreciate the quick catch, Hunting dog. Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 16:32, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's enough there now to demonstrate notability; set the banners above to "start" from "stub", and assigned "low" importance; let the appropriate groups adjust it as they will. Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 03:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a bot... :( - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Argh!! (And I was trying to so hard to do well!! ;-) Sorry, Adolphus79, mea culpa, and by the way, your patrolling efforts are appreciated. Best Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 03:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no worries, not the first time I've been called a bot... LOL - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]