Jump to content

Talk:John Jesnor Lindsay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Jesnor Lindsay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:46, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

[edit]

This article is a biography and should be objective. This article is full of opinions among other issues. His trial is mentioned in the beginning but not explained until later sections. This article reads as a review instead of a biography. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ktkvtsh:, post-GOCE, a Daily Telegraph (UK) piece on the subject [1] covers Lindasy's trials; scroll down the article to find the section. (if you hit the Telegraph paywall, turn off JavaScript in your browser). This should give you enough material to write a decent stub. The Daily Telegraph is considered a reliable source, and with the other sources, this should pass WP:SIGCOV. I can't find much else via Google but newspapers.com and the Internet Archive may be helpful. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]