Julius Caesar is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 24, 2004.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gaul, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gaul on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaulWikipedia:WikiProject GaulTemplate:WikiProject GaulGaul
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 6 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BsKulp (article contribs).
Caesar is currently part of the category "Genocide perpetrators". No part of this article seems to justify this, if there is consensus to considers parts of the Gallic wars a genocide it should be mentioned in the article to justify the inclusion, if not then the category should be removed. Looking at the Gallic wars article, one of the historians mentioned includes it in his book about historical genocide, the others dont seem to refer to it as such. There is a large disparity in actual casualty estimates by different authors, with the article weirdly and uncritically accepting those of David Henige, who is an Africanist and not a roman historian, and doesn't seem exceptionally prominent even in his own field. Generally historians seem to consider the casualty claims to be overexaggerated to flatter Caesar, with some stating they were nonetheless brutal while others claim they were comparatively mild to standard for the time. No claims are made that would indicate genocidal intent, not the mention the practical impossibility of executing one with four legions during something historians consider a propaganda and looting excursion. tl;dr things not supported by the article should not be implied by inclusion in a category. — jonas (talk) 17:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: This information is, as you know, mentioned in the article itself. The infobox is reserved for key facts about a subject, not exhaustive lists. Remsense ‥ 论06:26, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Suetonius paragraph literally begins that he was writing a century after the fact. How would he know? If he did, he certainly didn't better than those writing prior to him. Remsense ‥ 论17:07, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Inheriting knowledge of his seizures is one thing, articulating a lush description of his good looks with any confidence is quite another. Of course they were working from the same potential pool of sources—that's how we can make judgment calls about who's more reliable here. Remsense ‥ 论17:50, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They would not be quite realistic enough to be reliable carriers of historical information with this level of specificity, to my understanding. The point is, it's better to lead a section with concrete factual information than with more interpretation-heavy information, all else being equal (this is a bit of an odd case, really) Remsense ‥ 论17:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Mainly "tall" and "shapely limbs", really. Those are attributes that—especially the former—have potential to get muddled in the historical record instantly, sometimes even in the age of photography. This is verging on OR on my part at this point, so if you have secondary sources telling me I'm wrong here I'd be happy to defer. Remsense ‥ 论18:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm actually going to move this to the article talk page so we can see what others think. Interesting stuff I hadn't pondered so far, though. Remsense ‥ 论18:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Augustus is also heavily idealized on his statues (and does not even age in his 70s). Most Roman emperors are depicted as tall, well-built men, but that doesn't mean they actually were. The portraits do have individualistic traits to make them recognizable but still adhere to the "portrait types" that convey ideological agenda about the regime,[1], rather than being photographic snapshots of the individuals. Soidling (talk) 02:59, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
When it comes to these claims about who looked like what, I would strongly defer only to secondary sources. Images in the imperial era are heavily polished and idealised; it's rather plausible that descriptions written decades after the fact are not reliable (reflecting those idealised images rather than reality). I think we should not present any primary source material in the matter except as quoted by reliable secondary sources. Ifly6 (talk) 22:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Only the sources that are contemporary or the later sources that directly depend on them inform some reliable details about someone's looks. As for Caesar's appearance, Suetonius begins with "he is said to have been (Fuisse traditur)", which is saying that he is relying on hearsay, not a definitive eyewitness. This contrasts with the other instances where he actually cites his sources like Cicero's letters or the speeches of Gaius Memmius. I'd argue that we need to put back the information that Suetonius was not Caesar's contemporary and that he was relying on hearsay. Soidling (talk) 03:29, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Plutarch is the same secondary source who lived a century after Caesar, there is no reason to give him a preference. So can we put the more interesting notes of Suetonius above those of Plutarch? Becarefulbro (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a stylistic reason why the article uses the cognomen "Caesar" instead of his family name + cognomen "Julius Caesar"? Nivla (talk) 09:16, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is shorter. There is no actual benefit in terms of disambiguation from using "Julius Caesar" since during his lifetime essentially every person with the name Caesar is also a member of the Julii. Ifly6 (talk) 09:19, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 6 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BsKulp (article contribs).
Not done. It isn't. The theatre is named for Pompey, the general. Pompeii was a city. Ifly6 (talk) 16:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Moved from User talk:Remsense § Caesar