Jump to content

Talk:Kimmeridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

Currently the article mainly discusses Kimmeridge Bay, with mention of the village only in the first sentence. Perhaps the article should be moved to 'Kimmeridge Bay', with 'Kimmeridge' continuing as a separate article about the village. JimChampion (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing some language with encyclopedic language

[edit]

A few phrases in the last paragraph were subjective, or peacock, contrary to WP:PEACOCK style guidelines, "...avoid peacock terms which merely promote the subject of the article without imparting real information. Peacock terms often reflect unqualified opinion, and usually do not help establish the significance of an article."

Removed: "of some renown", "surfers will travel hundreds of miles to ride", "can be enjoyed by all", "(hardly ever!)", "perfect" (right handers), " The spiritual home of South coast surfing, this classic reef is for expert surfers only." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.129.53 (talk) 08:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject:Dorset assessment of importance: proposed change

[edit]

I propose that the importance of this article under the WikiProject:Dorset banner be changed, from 'High' as it currently stands, to 'Mid'. Although the oilfield and geological interest impart greater importance to Kimmeridge than to other Dorset villages of similar size, I personally do not feel this warrants such a high rating as 'High', as this leaves little room for manoevre for other articles deemed more important than this one. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 18:50, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep 'Mid' sounds more sensible to me. I notice that the pages Geology of Dorset and Isle of Purbeck are both currently rated 'Mid'. One or both of those could possibly do with being increased to 'High'. Pasicles (talk) 17:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm inclined to agree - such a move would at least bring them both into line with History of Dorset and Isle of Portland respectively. (Although it could be argued that these latter two articles are of greater significance in terms of general human interest [History] and international renown [Portland], I think for Dorset purposes they should be considered comparable). Actually I've noticed a number of the Project's article assessments seem a little anomalous - for instance why the small village of Ibberton should have been rated as 'Mid' but the River Frome only 'Low', is a bit curious. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 10:04, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kimmeridge, Dorset, UK - May 2012.jpg to appear as POTD soon

[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Kimmeridge, Dorset, UK - May 2012.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 23, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-10-23. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:16, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kimmeridge
Kimmeridge is a small village and civil parish on the Isle of Purbeck, a peninsula in Dorset, England. The Kimmeridgian geological age is named after the village, which is also the type locality for Kimmeridge clay. The coastline of the parish forms part of the Jurassic Coast, a World Heritage Site.Photograph: David Iliff
Archive – More featured pictures...
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kimmeridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kimmeridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:21, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kimmeridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kimmeridge&oldid=1207980861"