Talk:Led Zeppelin bootleg recordings

Fair use rationale for Image:BLAC.jpg

Image:BLAC.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Blueberryhill.jpg

The image Image:Blueberryhill.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

lol - you have got to be shitting me! Can someone please explain how the image of an uncopyrighted bootleg LP does not fall into the "fair use" category?

PCB —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.162.147 (talk) 19:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

most bootlegged band

sorry, but the most bootlegged band is the grateful dead, and the most recorded band is also the gratelful dead, and the most recorded guitar player is, what a wonder, jerry garcia of the grateful dead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.173.230.15 (talk) 22:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno if you can make that first claim, given that the Dead were known for not opposing live recordings of their concerts, to the extent that they allegedly reserved sections of the audience area for those who'd brought their own recording equipment along. Can you even call it a bootleg if the owner of the copyright didn't object? Shalom S. (talk) 22:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. In that instance it is an authorized bootleg, a standard term for artist-permitted recordings aside from the legally licensed product. Regardless, any claim for "most bootlegged artist" would need to be reliably sourced. / edg ☺ ☭ 01:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Tympani for the Butter Queen': removal

Tympani for the butter queen should be removed from the "Early bootlegs" section. To my knowledge. It was never released as an LP, only on CD. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.88.203.33 (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]