Talk:List of birds of South India

Birds Low‑importance

List of birds of South India is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

India: Karnataka / Kerala / Tamil Nadu Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as High-importance).

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vague scope

This list is not very useful and it is very difficult to determine whether species included are valid - South India is not well defined either biogeographically or politically. Shyamal (talk) 14:45, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also please note that Baker and Inglis is very outdated and sometimes grossly in error. Shyamal (talk) 14:51, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. I agree with you on the geographical vagueness of South India. But, let us not forget, India is a huge country and articles such as these would be of immense interest and value to people interested in birds. Hopefully, we will fix the errors over time with the help of experts like you. --Car Tick 15:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This list is not something that should be used as a starting point for improvement. My suggestion would be for you to erase the list and restart with the contents from something like "The Birds Of Southern India" by Richard Grimmett & Tim Inskipp, ISBN 0713651644 . Shyamal (talk) 02:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have the book in the reference, it has a much shorter list. --Car Tick 02:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the shorter list happens to be more accurate. The current list follows an outdated taxonomic and systematic treatment, inappropriate sequence and the longer length is due to its inclusion of a number of questionable subspecies. Shyamal (talk) 04:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok, i will make the changes. it will be a couple of weeks before i get to it though. --Car Tick 12:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Red Junglefowl and Oriental Pied Hornbill

Both the birds are included in the book of Grimmett and Inskipp I am assuming you are questioning that. Please go ahead and remove them if you are sure. --Car Tick 13:31, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have just rechecked in Rasmussen & Anderton - yes, they can be included - if we use a line at 21 deg N Latitude, there are some zones that seem likely. Shyamal (talk) 14:59, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snake bird nesting.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Snake bird nesting.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Snake bird nesting.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:57, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:North India which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]