Jump to content

Talk:List of mass panic cases

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Miracle of the Sun

[edit]

I removed the Miracle of the Sun due to WP:NPOV concerns. The article itself, nor any of the sources describe this as a confirmed case of mass hysteria. Scorpions13256 (talk) 03:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't checked how long it has been on the page, but removing it is definitely the right thing to do. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Randy Kryn It has been in the article for about two years. Scorpions13256 (talk) 03:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking that up. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of 2023 Musoli outbreak

[edit]

Hi all, I'm working on adding a few lines about the 2023 Musoli incident. IntegrityForever (talk) 22:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2024

[edit]

I would like to suggest an entry to be added to the list of mass panic cases. It pertains to the 'fugue epidemic' between 1887 and 1909. It was described by the philosophers Ian Hacking in his book "Mad Travelers", on which there is a wikipedia article. People would travel for hundreds of miles - often on foot - while being unconscious or half conscious. They often also lost (part of) their identity in the process. I believe this is a fitting addition to the list of mass panic cases - through perhaps it could also fit in the wikipedia article entitled 'Mass psychogenic illness'. What do you think? Maxmuller100 (talk) 14:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 18:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of ‘Pokémon Shock’.

[edit]

Calling that ‘mass hysteria’ when the reason why it happened is very well and clearly documented is kind of insulting. Those seizures happened due to bright, quick flashing lights. That’s not hysteria.

i put that forward for removal. Sneakycrown (talk) 23:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drone sightings

[edit]

Is it too early to add this to the list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:189:8400:A390:2DCD:F1AF:5A90:DB6D (talk) 05:16, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the article named "Mass Panic" when the body only refers to mass hysteria?

[edit]

Was there a discussion for this move? Angryapathy (talk) 16:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m confused as well. Either way, “hysteria” is a deeply misogynistic word that has no place here whatsoever. Strawberrypine (talk) 08:31, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

‘Hysteria’ is a Misogynistic Word

[edit]

“Hysteria” is a deeply misogynistic term that has been used for centuries to dismiss and discredit women’s emotions. It was originally coined as a diagnosis for women, as if any emotional reaction they had could only be a symptom of some supposed female disorder. It’s a perfect example of how language has been twisted and manipulated to invalidate women’s experiences and paint our natural reactions to oppression as something “wrong” with us, rather than a reflection of the world we live in. Change the word ‘hysteria’ to frenzy, and you’re good. Or are we testerical much? Strawberrypine (talk) 08:29, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strawberrypine, Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED. We WP:STICKTOSOURCE and use the language they do. I'm sorry if you do not like the terminology, but 'hysteria' is used in several different ways. Zenomonoz (talk) 08:31, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, right, because pointing out the misogynistic roots of a word is totally the same as ”censorship.” Got it. Let’s keep using harmful terms just because they’re there-no need to critically examine anything, right?
It’s not about being offended by the terminology, it’s about recognizing how language is used to perpetuate harmful, patriarchal ideas. “Hysteria” has historically been used to silence, discredit, and pathologize women’s emotions and experiences, often to justify oppression. Just because something is widely used doesn’t make it neutral or acceptable. We should be questioning and challenging these terms, not blindly repeating them, especially when they have such a misogynistic history. The word itself comes from the Greek “hysteria,” meaning “womb,” only further reinforcing the idea that women’s emotional responses are inherently linked to their bodies, particularly their reproductive organs. It’s a concept that’s rooted in misogyny, and that’s not something we should be casually perpetuating. 2A02:3100:5D6D:C300:3966:EC3C:8F13:D50C (talk) 08:36, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]