This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
I started to cite the list as created, and found it very cumbersome to work with. To easy the looking up shows in my encyclopedia od radio, I created a sortable table to aid in finding the shows. There are more citations to do, but I got a good start. There are still more in my book, but I have been called away. --K3vin (talk) 22:02, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know the table has a sort feature, but by default it really should be sorted by year of creation or alphabetical by title. This current way is counter-intuitive in the extreme, as the creators themselves are the least-known bit of info. — TAnthonyTalk23:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agreed with your idea. But had more on my plate. I was working on citing the sources, and just put in the sort to make that easier. I felt alpha by title was the best default. and with the sort ability, it was very low on my list of priority.
