Talk:List of royal tours of Canada (21st century)

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Commonwealth

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Commonwealth, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Commonwealth of Nations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CommonwealthWikipedia:WikiProject CommonwealthTemplate:WikiProject CommonwealthCommonwealth articles

British Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

International relations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

suggesting a split due to page size

I would like to suggest that this article be split due to page size. As of this post, it is roughly 88KB. The guideline at WP:SPINOUT is a good read regarding this issue. Any comments?--Rockfang (talk) 16:32, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Holy crap.. it is 88kb. I didn't think a list could get that big; and even taking the images out only reduces it to 86kb. If the article's to be split, along what lines would it be done? By century? --G2bambino (talk) 18:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That seems like a logical method to me. I'd suggest copying the intro to each resulting article. The Royal_tours_of_Canada#Transportation, Royal_tours_of_Canada#See_also, and Royal_tours_of_Canada#External_links sections as well. The pictures could each be put on their corresponding articles. The resulting 19th century article might still be a bit big, but at least it won't be 88KB. I suggest waiting a few more days though for additional input before making any changes.--Rockfang (talk) 01:25, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: I've done the split. I only split out the 20th century. I don't think the other centuries need to be split out yet. I copied over the see also, external links and intro sections over. I decided not to copy over the transportation section. The new article is long enough already.--Rockfang (talk) 01:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess what you've done is okay, though it's a bit wierd to jump from the 19th century to the 21st. All may need a bit of fine tuning (lead, etc.), but it seems good overall. --G2bambino (talk) 00:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Royal tours of Canada

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Royal tours of Canada's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "PT":

From History of monarchy in Canada: Trepanier, Peter (1989). "Some Visual Aspects of the Monarchical Tradition". Canadian Parliamentary Review. 27 (2). Ottawa: Commonwealth Parliamentary Association. Retrieved 12 February 2010.
From Canadian royal symbols: Trepanier, Peter (2004). "Some Visual Aspects of the Monarchical Tradition" (PDF). Canadian Parliamentary Review. 27 (2). Ottawa: Commonwealth Parliamentary Association: 28. Retrieved 8 October 2009.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Private retreats

Should private retreats during an official tour be listed? For example, the Queen stayed in Jasper in the middle of her 2005 trip, and she's possibly going to be spending a day somewhere in Quebec during her upcoming trip.--Ibagli (Talk) 23:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Date notation

Would it be terribly inconsiderate to change the date notation from Month/Day to Day/Month? Surely that's not only the preferred style used by the Canadian government but also the Commonwealth. Haku8645 (talk) 01:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Canada-related articles) for several discussions on this topic. In Canada, month-day format is by far the most common in newspapers, magazines, books, and government publications. However, there are some people who strongly favour day-month format. Any mass change from one format to the other in Canada-related articles is sure to be controversial. If a given article is consistently in one format, I suggest just leave it. Indefatigable (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign royalty

The visits of foreign royalty shouldn't be included in this list. 1) These aren't described as "royal tours"; they're "foreign visits" or some such. The term "royal tour" is always used in Canada to refer to tours by members of Canada's royal family. 2) The coverage is incomplete: no visits by foreign kings and queens. 3) The 18th-20th century list doesn't have the same scope and likely won't (it would be quite an effort to source all the visits of foreign royalty to Canada over 300 years). --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 07:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on List of royal tours of Canada (21st century). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of royal tours of Canada (21st century). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071016200458/http://cambridgetimes.ca:80/cam/news/news_777717.html to http://www.cambridgetimes.ca/cam/news/news_777717.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of royal tours of Canada (21st century). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.theprovince.com/Prince%20Edward%20attend%20Games/2691846/story.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100831104643/http://www.qor.com:80/index2.html to http://www.qor.com/index2.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110502035808/http://www.tourneeroyale-royaltour.gc.ca:80/ to http://tourneeroyale-royaltour.gc.ca

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of royal tours of Canada (21st century). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]