Talk:Listed buildings in Whitwell and Selside

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles

Lancashire and Cumbria

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles

Architecture

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles

Lists

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

Proposed merge of Listed buildings in Fawcett Forest with Listed buildings in Whitwell and Selside

Parishes have been combined in 2020 to form Selside and Fawcett Forest PamD 20:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting to note: Search on NHLE for listed buildings in Selside and Fawcett Forest now shows 22 entries, while these two constituent lists contain 11 and 12 - so one entry seems to have disappeared. Or was there somewhere which was listed in both lists? Needs looking into! PamD 20:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: It seems to be Bannisdale High Bridge which appears in both lists. Sometimes a listing includes in brackets "That Part In X Cp" like Shaldon Bridge. Also agree with merging the lists per Talk:Listed buildings in Scalthwaiterigg#Proposed merge of Listed buildings in Skelsmergh with Listed buildings in Scalthwaiterigg. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merging the lists seems sensible, especially as the parishes have just merged, rather than changing their original boundaries (something different has happened in Cheshire). As the original author, I am prepared to do the merge, if there is agreement that this should go ahead. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 13:43, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter I. Vardy Well volunteered - I'm sure you're best placed to do the merge as being the most familiar with the format of the lists. Thanks! PamD 18:44, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure of the procedure. Agreement to merging seems likely; at what stage shall I go ahead to do it? --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 07:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MERGECLOSE suggests we wait a week from the merge proposal, at which point anyone including the proposer can close the discussion - though I doubt that anyone would object if you did it sooner. Perhaps I shouldn't have made a formal proposal but just put a message on the talk pages - further up WP:MERGE it says "Any editor can perform a merger. No permission or discussion is needed if you think the merge is uncontroversial; just do it (but it might get reverted)."! I can't see anyone objecting. PamD 08:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how it needs 7 days especially when the author has agreed, it seems like an uncontroversial case per Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers#When to propose a merger item 1. Also this kind of thing may be worth mentioning at WP:DEFUNCTS. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone ahead and merged the lists. As they stood, they were incorrect and did not reflect the current situation. I have made the original lists into redirects. Not sure that I have done everything correctly - would someone please check. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 10:19, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]