Talk:National Rose Garden

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Canberra Low‑importance

National Rose Garden is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra (assessed as Low-importance).

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

This article is incorrect!

Old Parliament House Gardens is totally separate from the National Rose Garden. Old Parliament House Gardens are located on both sides of Old Parliament House were as National Rose Garden is located in front of the Old Parliament House. Bidgee (talk) 02:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This article accurately describes the Old Parliament House Gardens, not the National Rose Gardens. I think the listing in the Australian Heritage Database (AHDB) is definitive. It describes the National Rose Garden (under "Statement of Significance") as being in front of Old Parliament House. The Old Parliament House Gardens are on both sides of Old Parliament House. Under "Location" (at the bottom of the page), the AHDB describes the National Rose Garden as being located at "King George Terrace and Parkes Place, Parkes, on the southern halves of Block 4 Section 34 and Block 1 Section 59, Parkes." That corresponds to this location I've marked in Google Maps. The images shown in the AHDB also confirm is location, especially those showing the front of Old Parliament House which is not visible from the Old Parliament House Gardens. Google Maps also shows both gardens in the locations I've described.

I can probably be considered an expert in this field as I have GIS experience and have performed Australian government mapping work for Heritage purposes.

I believe this page should be renamed to Old Parliament House Gardens and a new page created for National Rose Garden using information from the AHDB.

Funkmother (talk) 02:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree. The 'National Rose Garden' and the 'Old Parliament House Gardens' are separate. Both gardens are administered by the National Capital Authority. The 'Old Parliament House Gardens' consist of the House of Representatives (located East of OPH) and Senate (located West of OPH). It is heritage listed as its own entity. The 'National Rose Garden' is North of OPH, divided on either side of the Local Aboriginal Tent Embassy. Locally known as Nationals East and Nationals West. They are also heritage but as part of the larger surrounds of parks, trees and statues. Not listed as individual heritage gardens. NorthEast*Canberra (talk) 13:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.nationalcapital.gov.au/index.php/attractions-managed-by-the-nca/old-parliament-house-gardens?showall=1. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 08:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]