Talk:New York State Route 361

New York State Route 361 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 16, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

New York (state): Hudson Valley

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Low‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Types
	U.S. state highway
	Locations
	New York
	Notes and alerts
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 361/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
I would prefer one single paragraph in the lead (and I believe this short an article can bear a one-paragraphed lead). I would also like to see the year 1946 in the lead. In the history section, there is one very long sentence (five lines on my screen) that needs to be split up into shorter pieces.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The article is very short—but I guess there isn't much to say about a 3.9 km road, so it will suffice.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold until the minor issues have been dealt with. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:23, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing as the route is/was in my area, I might as well help out. Done with everything. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 13:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Then I see no other choice than to pass it with pleasure. Arsenikk ^(talk) 14:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]