Talk:Nunc pro tunc

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[Lord Chancellor#Former judicial functions|Lord Chancellor]] The anchor (#Former judicial functions) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

this article needs work

This article is a mess grammatically at certain points. And the several of the statements of law are misleading and possibly incorrect. At the very least, they suggest a generality that is inappropriate. This article needs substantial work and ought to have a warning on the main page (I don't know how to put those stub, etc. warnings in, but somebody should).

-- but the "contradicts itself" flag doesn't seem to be the right one. 68.213.98.28 20:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arkansas bar exam

When I took the Arkansas bar exam it not only had essay and multiple choice sections, but also a definitional section, requiring the applicant to provide a definition for a legal term, e.g., "What is a check?" The story I heard then was that when test-takers were asked to define "nunc pro tunc" back in the 1970's, one applicant wrote "He's a Vietnamese general." They gave him 5 points for trying, or so the story went. --Zeno Cosini~enwiki (talk) 02:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]