Talk:Old Charges (Freemasonry)

Duplicate coverage?

Hypersite, this article appears to have a significant overlap with Masonic manuscripts. I was going to tag for a merge and redirect but I am not sure of the extent to which any content (or references) in this new article adds significantly to that of the other article. Could you review this please? AllyD (talk) 10:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @AllyD, my original intent was to create a full and complete article dedicated to the old charges, since the section on old charges within the manuscripts page is rather short compared to the amount of material that could be expanded upon.

Unfortunately I haven't had the time to dedicate to this article recently, but I should soon be able to continue the work and make this a full-fledged article, which would make it too lengthy to fit as a section of another page and deserves a dedicated page befitting its depth and significance, in my humble estimation. HyperSite (talk) 08:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hi, Is there no images that could go in, brighten it. Its is a great article.

scope_creep^Talk 12:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LLM claim

Miiversal, you placed a tag suggesting that this is an AI-generated article. Can you provide a rationale here, so that your finding can be assessed and discussed? In the meantime, I am reverting the tag. AllyD (talk) 19:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 May 2025

It has been proposed in this section that Old Charges (Freemasonry) be renamed and moved to Old Charges.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Old Charges (Freemasonry) → Old Charges – Perhaps the article doesn't need "Freemasonry" in parentheses in the title because there are apparently no other things on the English Wikipedia called "Old Charges". 2804:388:E059:C7CD:0:5F:C499:1101 (talk) 00:42, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The base name Old Charges is a redirect to Masonic manuscripts#Old Charges where Old Charges (Freemasonry) is listed as the main article. Given this, the main article should certainly be at the base name. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]