Talk:Ons Heemecht

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Luxembourg Top‑importance

	Luxembourg portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LuxembourgWikipedia:WikiProject LuxembourgTemplate:WikiProject LuxembourgLuxembourg
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 05:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The title is missspelled. See http://lb.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ons_Heemecht --217.86.28.51 (talk) 13:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Heemecht seems to be the convention. Erudy (talk) 20:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A little more evidence than a foreign Wikipedia link is gonna be needed to support this claim. (Google: "Ons Heemecht" -wikipedia = 1620, "Ons Hémécht" -wikipedia = 2640, "Ons Hemecht" - wikipedia = 1900; Google Scholar favors the proposal 5-to-1, though). JPG-GR (talk) 20:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The Luxembourg government (see page linked from the article) use the proposed (Heemecht) spelling, which should be definitive enough. 78.105.161.182 (talk) 15:06, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Move Ons Heemecht to Ons Heemecht/version 2 and then Ons Hémécht to Ons Heemecht. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Ons Hémecht

Isn't Ons Hémecht the correct Luxembourgish spelling? —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]