Talk:Paper model

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Craft

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Craft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of craft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CraftWikipedia:WikiProject CraftTemplate:WikiProject CraftCraft articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Paper size#Expressing paper thickness and density|paper weight]] The anchor (#Expressing paper thickness and density) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Merging

I merged Card model and Papercraft here to Paper model.
The old pages are still there behind the redirect. I think their are the same subject under diferent names.
So i think it's a case of:
"If two pages are duplicates or otherwise redundant, one should be merged and redirected to the other, using the most common, or more general page name. This does not require process or formal debate beforehand." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Merging
and of
"Be bold"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Be_bold_in_updating_pages--ZeroA4 (talk) 01:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of links

It would seem that several users feel there are two many external links. While I don't necessarily disagree just cutting them all out in one go seems extreme. How 'bout removing the worst offenders with a clear reason. Scottanon (talk) 14:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links section

This article's external links section had become a mini trade directory, complete with edit wars over whose sites were to be included or excluded. Use of external links sections in this way is not allowed, and a sampling of the links provided showed no significant informational content other than being a collection of links to paper model companies. Accordingly, I've now removed all of the external links.

Please do not simply restore the long list of external links. Instead, please add individual links one by one, and only if strictly justified by their informative content, ensuring that they point to pages with actual informative content on paper modelling, as opposed to simply at the root of a commercial site. All else being equal, hobbyist sites that do not sell paper model products should be preferred to sites that do. -- The Anome (talk) 21:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good choice! But the links section is once again being clotted, although many are free model sites, but remember Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not free model link database, I have my own site on free models but that's obviously unsuitable to put in here. The article on papermodels should only include external links that are direct introductions to the hobby, and only free model sites that are REPRESENTATIVE of the mass of resources. That also excludes forum links too. I've included links to Hal and Maly in the text, for they are representative of the armada of the publishing companies out there, for which little was mentioned in the text. --And sites with copyright violation (ie scans of commercial kits. Sr-Fraude / 4ch po channel etc) should at least, not be allowed in the links section. (Am I right on this?) Also edited the tone on making of papermodels, Wikipedia is not a guidebook to how you'll do something. LexWilson (talk) 11:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cardboard modeling

The article on cardboard modeling should be merged into this one. They are basically the same. Grantmidnight (talk) 16:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Video Games

The section on video games was rewritten. If anyone wants to improve it, that would be highly appreciated. Ultima069 (talk) 00:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Video Games Section

I've got a nice link for the video games section, that shows piece by piece how a paper model is done. It's authorized by it's owner to put it in here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m0R9yhYZSQ . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.141.62.115 (talk) 20:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]